Categories: The Family Lawyer Education Center429 words1.6 min read

The Relevance of Family Violence on Family Law Property Settlement

About the Author: Kristdel Bolog

Kristdel practices solely in Family Law has been a Partner at The Family Lawyer since June 2019. Aside from her amazing ability to recite from memory the entire “Ode to Spot” by Commander Data, she has a wealth of knowledge and practical experience from a decade in the field of family law. Kristdel’s passion for the law and a love of helping people through difficult times enables her to put peoples minds at ease, even during complicated or bitter family court proceedings. As our resident “empath” she is The Family Lawyers’ Counsellor and is always there to listen to her colleagues or clients and bring a smile to their faces. Her nickname around the office is “the nerd”, a badge she wears proudly. Kristdel is hardworking, knowledgeable and dedicated to getting great outcomes for her clients. You can contact her at or on 1300 111 835.

March 29, 2022


In Australia, we have a “no fault” jurisdiction for Family Law. Therefore is family violence relevant to determining how the property pool should be divided? This is a complicated question. This article examines a number of cases to assess how the courts have treated violent conduct in the context of property settlements.

Kennon v Kennon

In 1997, the Family Court of Australia considered whether family violence could change the outcome of a property settlement.

In this case, it was a short relationship where the Husband had brought in significantly more assets into the relationship and had a significantly higher income. There were no children of the relationship. The Wife alleged that she was the victim of family violence. The Husband was prone to excessive alcohol consumption leading to fits of rage and physical violence, where the Wife alleged that she feared for her safety. She developed a psychological injury described by her doctor as suffering from “an anxiety state”.

The court determined that in the context of assessing contributions, an adjustment could be made if it could be satisfied that a course of violent conduct could be established, the violent conduct had a discernible impact on the victim and the victim’s contributions to the relationship had been significantly more arduous because of the violence.

The court noted that there are only a narrow band of cases where this consideration would apply.

Kennon v Kennon is the leading case in Australia on the impact of violent conduct on property settlements following a breakdown of relationship. However, it has had little impact on the post-separation divisions ordered by the Family Court of Australia. Kennon has been widely criticised for not recognising the complexities of family violence. For instance, it is often hard for victims to prove that family violence has in fact occurred when violent conducts usually happen behind closed doors, in the absence of witnesses.

Coad v Coad

In 2011, the Family Court of Australia considered the matter of Coad v Coad. The Husband attempted to murder his Wife. The Wife sustained residual and lifelong disabilities, impacting on her capacity to work and earn an income. The injuries inflicted made it more onerous than it otherwise would have been for her to care for her child. The wife was awarded 90% of the property pool.

Keating v Keating

In 2019, the Family Court of Australia determined that the Kennon ruling could be applied more broadly. The court held that corroborative evidence was not a requirement for family violence to be accepted and to be accounted for in the context of determining property settlement.

How can we help?

If you need legal advice or support, our experienced and compassionate family lawyers can assist you, whatever stage you may be at. Talk to us today for a FREE 15-minute family law consultation by calling 1300 111 835 or via email at we look forward to helping you achieve a better outcome.