
Can a Binding Financial Agreement be set aside?
Understand when a Binding Financial Agreement may be challenged or set aside, including legal advice, disclosure, pressure, duress and unconscionable conduct.
Read article →Financial certainty, whatever the future holds.
A Binding Financial Agreement is a private legal contract made under the Family Law Act. It lets you agree in advance how finances will be handled if your relationship ends - or formalise a settlement after separation. Done properly, it removes the Court from the equation entirely.
A binding financial agreement is a private legal arrangement that can deal with how property, financial resources or maintenance will be managed if a relationship ends or has already ended.
Financial agreements can be made before, during or after a marriage or de facto relationship and are often used for asset protection, family wealth planning or post-separation settlement.
Independent legal advice is required. A financial agreement should not be signed unless each party has received independent legal advice about the effect of the agreement and the advantages and disadvantages of entering into it.
Full and frank financial disclosure is strongly recommended and included in the Family Law Act. If a party does not properly understand the other party's financial position, the agreement may be more vulnerable to challenge. Disclosure should usually include assets, liabilities, income, superannuation, business interests, trusts, companies, inheritances, loans and other financial resources.
A Binding Financial Agreement is only as strong as the care taken in preparing it. Poor drafting, inadequate disclosure, procedural errors or pressure at the time of signing are among the most common reasons agreements are successfully challenged - often years after they were signed.
We advise on agreements before, during or after marriage or de facto relationships - each stage has different rules.
We help identify the financial interests that need careful treatment in the drafting.
We help you understand whether a BFA or another pathway may be more suitable for your situation.
We guide the signing and advice process so the strict procedural requirements are properly met.
Every financial agreement depends on the relationship stage, asset structure, level of disclosure, timing and purpose of the agreement.
Clarify whether the agreement is being considered before, during or after a relationship.
Consider assets, liabilities, superannuation, businesses, trusts, income and financial resources.
Consider whether a BFA is suitable, or whether consent orders may be more appropriate.
Prepare the agreement (or review proposed terms) with careful attention to risk and enforceability.
Explain the effect of the agreement and the advantages and disadvantages before signing.
The agreement is completed, independent legal advice requirements are met, and you can move forward knowing your arrangements are documented and protected.
Three issues decide whether a financial agreement actually does its job - and each one is usually tested years after the document is signed.
Each party must receive independent legal advice from their own lawyer before signing - about the effect of the agreement on their rights and the advantages and disadvantages of entering into it. One lawyer cannot advise both parties.
The advice requirements go to whether the agreement is binding at all. Each lawyer usually provides a signed statement confirming the advice was given, and a copy is generally provided to the other party or their lawyer.
Agreements signed shortly before a wedding are more vulnerable to claims of duress, undue influence or unconscionable conduct - particularly where one party believed the wedding would not proceed unless they signed.
Start early - if the wedding is imminent, it may be safer to defer the agreement and make it during the marriage instead.
An agreement is not set aside merely because one party later regrets signing it or considers it unfair. But the Court keeps the power to set a financial agreement aside on specific grounds.
These include fraud (including non-disclosure of a material matter), conduct making the agreement void, voidable or unenforceable, impracticability, a material change in circumstances relating to a child that causes hardship, and certain superannuation issues.
A financial agreement cannot be varied informally by emails or verbal arrangements. Ending or replacing it generally requires a properly drafted termination agreement or a new financial agreement - with independent legal advice again.
Review the agreement when major life events occur - especially the birth of children - so it can be replaced if it no longer works.
Both can formalise financial arrangements, but they operate in different ways - and the right choice depends on your relationship stage and what you are trying to achieve.
Orders made by the Court after the parties reach agreement, usually after separation. The Court must be satisfied the property orders are just and equitable before making them, and once made they are enforceable Court orders.
A private contract that is not approved by the Court when it is made and is not required to be fair. That is why the drafting, disclosure, advice and signing process carry so much weight.
After separation, consent orders are often the more appropriate pathway for a final property settlement - we help you compare both before you commit.
Plain-English guidance selected for this service area.

Understand when a Binding Financial Agreement may be challenged or set aside, including legal advice, disclosure, pressure, duress and unconscionable conduct.
Read article →
Understand prenups, binding financial agreements, disclosure, legal advice and when a financial agreement may be useful.
Read article →
Financial disclosure explained for property settlement, including hidden assets, cryptocurrency, documents and practical next steps.
Read article →Choose the office that best suits your matter, travel and appointment preference. Every location connects to the same specialist family law team.